OpenAI has formally escalated its concerns regarding Chinese AI startup DeepSeek to the halls of Congress. In a memo sent to the House Select Committee on China on February 12, 2026, OpenAI warned that DeepSeek is employing increasingly sophisticated "distillation" techniques to harvest outputs from US frontier models and train its own systems, including the widely discussed R1 model.
This move marks a significant shift from technical rivalry to geopolitical strategy. While model distillation—using a larger, more capable model to teach a smaller, more efficient one—is a common industry practice, OpenAI alleges that DeepSeek is using "new, obfuscated methods" specifically designed to bypass safeguards and mask the origin of their training data.
According to reports from Bloomberg and the full memo shared by Bill Bishop, OpenAI claims these copied capabilities do not carry over the original safety guardrails, raising potential risks in sensitive fields like biology and chemistry.
The "Distillation" Dispute
Distillation is not new. It’s the secret sauce behind many "efficient" small models. However, OpenAI’s complaint focuses on the scale and intent of DeepSeek’s operations. The memo outlines how some accounts routed access through third-party services to hide their identity while systematically extracting reasoning patterns from OpenAI’s models.
The core argument is safety: if you copy the "smarts" of a model without its "conscience" (safety filters), you get a powerful engine with no brakes. OpenAI argues that this unchecked proliferation of frontier-level capabilities undermines US safety standards and gives foreign adversaries a shortcut to advanced AI without the rigorous safety testing US companies invest in.
From Competition to National Security
This is no longer just about market share; it’s about national security. By taking this directly to the House Select Committee on China, OpenAI is explicitly asking for government intervention.
The response from US lawmakers has been sharp, signaling that AI model provenance is becoming a legislative priority. If the US government accepts OpenAI’s framing, we could see:
- Stricter Export Controls: Not just on chips, but potentially on access to model APIs and weights.
- "KYC" for AI: "Know Your Customer" requirements for AI labs to verify who is accessing their models and for what purpose.
- Sanctions or Blocks: Specific actions against foreign entities found to be "strip-mining" US intellectual property.
What This Means for Small Businesses (SMBs)
For the average small business owner or developer, this high-stakes geopolitical drama might feel distant. But the ripple effects could hit close to home.
1. The Future of "Cheap" AI
DeepSeek’s R1 model made waves because it offered GPT-4 level reasoning at a fraction of the cost. This "race to the bottom" on price has been a boon for SMBs and startups building AI-powered tools on a budget.
- The Risk: If regulations clamp down on distillation or restrict how models can be trained, the supply of ultra-low-cost, high-performance models could shrink.
- The Impact: SMBs might face higher API costs if the "budget" options are regulated out of existence or forced to pay licensing fees to the original model creators.
2. Regulatory Compliance
If you are building an application on top of an open-weights model like DeepSeek, you need to watch this space.
- The Risk: Future regulations could penalize the use of models deemed to be "stolen" or "non-compliant" with US safety standards.
- The Impact: SMBs might need to audit their AI supply chain. Using a "grey market" model to save money could become a liability if the US government imposes sanctions on the provider.
3. Access to Innovation
OpenAI’s push for government action suggests a future where access to the most powerful models is more tightly controlled.
- The Risk: "Tiered" access where only vetted, large enterprises get the keys to the latest frontier models, while SMBs are left with older or regulated versions.
- The Impact: This could widen the gap between what big tech can build and what independent developers can ship.
Conclusion
The era of the "wild west" in AI development is closing. OpenAI’s memo is a clear signal that the leaders of the US AI industry want the government to build fences. For DeepSeek, this is a major challenge to their legitimacy. For US policymakers, it’s a call to action.
And for the rest of us? It’s a reminder that in the world of AI, technology and geopolitics are now inextricably linked.
Sources:
- Bloomberg Scoop: @shiringhaffary
- Full Memo: @niubi
- Additional Coverage: @veermasrani, @kyleichan, @jackpan86, @AbdulRehma1879
Related Reading: